Mash up
The
concise Oxford Dictionary defines simple as “not compound, consisting of one
element, all of one kind, involving only one operation or power.” In the context
of this paper, simplicity contains some level of consistency in the patterns
and components that are a flexible concept that
will ensure the sustainability of the project and architectural design. As simplicity
increases, it ensures consistency of buildings throughout
the territory, construction quality, respect of rural identity and recognition
of the regional territory icons and landscape memory. There are both objective and
subjective varieties of organisational simplicity, and most of these are
interdependent. The objectives considered in the architectural
approach are dominance of a single goal
or subunit, information systems and routines that organisation
must have open, consistent, frequent, and quality communication between teams. As yet, we have only
dealt individually with the factors that contribute to simplicity. The key challenge to a
meritocratic process though is Composition of a quality project that stands out positively in terms of simplicity and
stagnation. Again,
the result is a simpler to achieve consistency and more consistent view of the world.
Overall Concept review : Consistency is a quality of Simplicity.
Folly: Simplicity can achieve Consistency.
Pritchett, Dan. "Consistency vs.Innovatio" 10 Nov 2010. Accessed 13 May 2013. <http://www.addsimplicity.com/adding_simplicity_an_engi/2010/11/consistency-vs-innovation.html>
"Research and Training Centre in the Construction Trades / ACDF*" 12 Jan 2011. ArchDaily. Accessed 13 May 2013. <http://www.archdaily.com/103509>
Miller, Danny. "The Architecture of Simplicity" The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 18, No. 1 (Jan., 1993): 116-138 Accessed: 13/05/2013. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/258825>